刘桂宾

• 1:南开大学图书馆

摘要(Abstract)：

为适应充满动态性和不确定性的信息环境,2015年2月,美国大学与研究图书馆学会颁布了《高等教育信息素养框架》(简称《框架》)作为指导信息素养教育的纲领性文件。与以前的文件不同,《框架》不再将信息素养限定为一套去情境化的技能,而是采用概念性方法将信息、研究和学术方面的相关理念融为一体。文章以信息素养的相关研究成果为理论指导,以情境为分析视角,对《框架》的制定背景、哲学基础以及信息素养概念进行解析,并详细阐述《框架》是如何将信息素养及其实施置于情境中的。分析表明:关注情境已成为信息素养研究的必要条件,除了理解信息和信息素养行为外,《框架》强调更要解读它们所处的情境。

关键词(KeyWords)： 信息素养;情境;学科情境;话语社区;高等教育信息素养框架

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 2017年度天津市哲学社会科学基金项目“基于建构学习理论的大学生信息素养研究”(项目编号:TJTQ17-001)研究成果之一

作者(Author): 刘桂宾

DOI: 10.16603/j.issn1002-1027.2019.04.011

参考文献(References)：

• 1 Tuominen K,Savolainen R,Talja S,et al.Information literacy as a sociotechnical practice[J].The Library Quarterly,2005,75(3):329-345.
• 2 Aharony N.Information literacy in the professional literature:an exploratory analysis[J].Aslib Proceedings,2010,62(3):261-282.
• 3 Montiel-Overall P.Information literacy:Toward a cultural model[J].The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science,2007,31(1):43-68.
• 4 Gullikson S.Faculty perceptions of ACRL's information literacy competency standards for higher education[J].The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2006,32(6):583-592.
• 5 Spiranec S,Zorica M B,Kos D,et al.Information Literacy in participatory environments:the turn towards a critical literacy perspective[J].Journal of documentation,2016,72(2):247-264.
• 6 Kuglitsch R.Teaching for transfer:Reconciling the framework with disciplinary information literacy[J].portal:Libraries and the Academy,2015,15(3):457-470.
• 7 Association of College and Research Libraries.Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education[EB/OL][2018-09-03].http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/Framework_ILHE.pdf.
• 8 韩丽风,王茜,李津,等.高等教育信息素养框架[J].大学图书馆学报,2015,33(6):118-126.
• 9 刘彩娥,冯素洁.ACRL的《高等教育信息素养框架》解读与启示[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(9):143-147.
• 10 Oakleaf M.A roadmap for assessing student learning using the new framework for information literacy for higher education[J].The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2014,5(40):510-514.
• 11 杨鹤林.阈值概念:构建美国《高等教育信息素养框架》[J].图书馆杂志,2016,35(5):68-74.
• 12 Fulkerson D M,Ariew S A,Jacobson T E.Revisiting metacognition and metaliteracy in the ACRL framework[J].Communications in Information Literacy,2017,11(1):21-41.
• 13 Seeber K.This Is really happening:criticality and discussions of context in ACRL's framework for information literacy[J].Communications in Information Literacy,2015,9(2):157-163.
• 14 杨鹤林.美国《高等教育信息素养框架》分析与思考[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(12):141-146.
• 15 秦小燕.美国高校信息素养标准的改进与启示——ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》解读[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(19):139-144.
• 16 桂罗敏.从技术到价值:《美国高等教育信息素养框架》的文化阐释[J].图书情报知识,2016 (2):14-20,68.
• 17 Battista A,Ellenwood D,Gregory L,et al.Seeking social justice in the ACRL framework[J].Communications in Information Literacy,2015,9(2):111-125.
• 18 Johnson B,Mccracken I M.Reading for integration,identifying complementary threshold concepts:the ACRL framework in conversation with naming what we know:threshold concepts of writing studies[J].Communications in Information Literacy,2016,10(2):178-198.
• 19 Gregory L,Higgins S.Reorienting aninformation literacy program toward social justice:mapping the core values of librarianship to the ACRL framework[J].Communications in Information Literacy,2017,11(1):42-54.
• 20 李曈,叶志锋.基于ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》的我国高校信息素养教材质量评价与编写建议[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(16):54-59,109.
• 21 李峰,郭兆红.高校信息素养教育生态系统构建路径研究——基于 ACRL《高等教育信息素养框架》的视角[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(3):44-48.
• 22 杨晓雯.《高等教育信息素养框架》下的数字人文教育探讨[J/OL].图书馆论坛,2018:9[2018-09-03].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/44.1306.G2.20180608.1334.012.html.
• 23 Falcone A,Mccartin L.Be critical,but be flexible:using the framework to facilitate student learning outcome development[J].College & Research Libraries News,2018,79(1):16-19.
• 24 符绍宏,高冉.《高等教育信息素养框架》指导下的信息素养教育改革[J].图书情报知识,2016(3):26-32.
• 25 Gammons R,Inge L.Using the ACRL framework to develop a student-centered model for program-level assessment[J].Communications in Information Literacy,2017,11(1):168-184.
• 26 Anderson M J.Rethinking assessment:information literacy instruction and the ACRL framework[J/OL].School of Information Student Research Journal,2015,5(2):13[2018-09-03].https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/slissrj/vol5/iss2/3/.
• 27 Holliday W.Frame works:using metaphor in theory and practice in information literacy[J].Communications in Information Literacy,2017,11(1):4-20.
• 28 Foasberg N M.From standards to frameworks for IL:How the ACRL framework addresses critiques of the standards[J].portal:Libraries and the Academy,2015,15(4):699-717.
• 29 Bombaro C.The framework is elitist[EB/OL][2018-09-03].https://scholar.dickinson.edu/faculty_publications/500/.
• 30 Rinne N A.The new framework:a truth-less construction just waiting to be scrapped?[J].Reference Services Review,2017,45(1):54-66.
• 31 Knapp M,Brower S.The ACRL framework for information literacy in higher education:implications for health sciences librarianship[J].Medical reference services quarterly,2014,33(4):460-468.
• 32 Wang L,Bruce C,Hughes H.Sociocultural theories and their application in information literacy research and education[J].Australian Academic & Research Libraries,2011,42(4):296-308.
• 33 Julien H,Williamson K.Discourse and practice in information literacy and information seeking:gaps and opportunities[J/OL].Information Research,2010,15(1):13[2018-07-20].https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ925506.pdf.
• 34 Lloyd A,Williamson K.Towards an understanding of information literacy in context:Implications for research[J].Journal of Librarianship and information Science,2008,40(1):3-12.
• 35 Limberg L,Sundin O,Talja S.Three theoretical perspectives on information literacy[J].HUMAN IT:Journal for Information Technology Studies as a Human Science,2012,11(2):93-130.
• 36 Association of College and Research Libraries.Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education[EB/OL][2018-09-03].https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/105645/standards.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
• 37 Grafstein A.A discipline-based approach to information literacy[J].The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2002,28(4):197-204.
• 38 Andersen J.The public sphere and discursive activities:information literacy as sociopolitical skills[J].Journal of documentation,2006,62(2):213-228.
• 39 Mutch A.Information literacy:an exploration[J].International Journal of Information Management,1997,17(5):377-386.
• 40 Townsend L,Brunetti K,Hofer A R.Threshold concepts and information literacy[J].portal:Libraries and the Academy,2011,11(3):853-869.
• 41 Eckerdal J R.Libraries,democracy,information literacy,and citizenship:an agonistic reading of central library and information studies’ concepts[J].Journal of Documentation,2017,73(5):1010-1033.
• 42 Limberg L.Three conceptions of information seeking and use[EB/OL][2018-09-03].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228715275_Three_conceptions_of_information_seeking_and_use.
• 43 Hj?rland B,Nielsen L K.Subject access points in electronic retrieval[M].Annual Review of Information Science and Technology.New Jersey:Information Today,2001:249-298.
• 44 Gullbekk E.Apt information literacy?A case of interdisciplinary scholarly communication[J].Journal of Documentation,2016,72(4):716-736.
• 45 Porter J E.Intertextuality and the discourse community[J].Rhetoric review,1986,5(1):34-47.
• 46 Kent T.On the very idea of a discourse community[J].College composition and communication,1991,42(4):425-445.
• 47 Wardle E,Downs D.Writing about writing:a college reader[M].Boston:Bedford/St.Martin,2014:466-473.
• 48 Deodato J.The patron as producer:libraries,web 2.0,and participatory culture[J].Journal of Documentation,2014,70(5):734-758.
• 49 Flowerdew J.Discourse community,legitimate peripheral participation,and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar[J].TESOL quarterly,2000,34(1):127-150.
• 50 Kutner L,Armstrong A.Rethinking information literacy in a globalized world[J].Communications in Information Literacy,2012,6(1):24-33.
• 51 Huvila I.The complete information literacy?Unforgetting creation and organization of information[J].Journal of librarianship and information science,2011,43(4):237-245.
• 52 Freeburg D.A knowledge lens for information literacy:conceptual framework and case study[J].Journal of Documentation,2017,73(5):974-991.
• 53 Pawley C.Information literacy:a contradictory coupling[J].The library quarterly:Information,Community,Policy,2003,73(4):422-452.